Restored Apollo 11 EVA

Share this video on

What's Hot

What's New

Top Grossing

Top of the Chart


Alexander Brown : Whether intentional or not, your question implies that we haven't been back because we're no longer able to do it now. The primary reason we haven't isn't so much capability but money. NASA's budget is currently about 0.5% of the federal budget. During the height of the Apollo program that figure was about 5%, with the vast majority being funneled directly to Apollo. Throw enough money, national pride, curiosity and anti-Soviet sentiment at a problem and it will get taken care of in a hurry. It was the right time; a perfect storm, so to speak. The goals, among other things, were making sure a human being could survive space travel and then, hopefully, to send a few to the moon. Those were accomplished (and, to be fair, the fruits of that labor continued to serve us well into the future). The problem was that after these were accomplished people began to wonder why we needed to continue funding the same mission over and over again. An expensive mission. Adjusted for inflation, each Apollo landing (not mission, but landing) cost roughly $20B. To put that into perspective, that's more than NASA's entire budget this year alone. A human standing on a surface other than the Earth is a truly amazing feat for not only our country but our species as a whole. But, as amazing as it is, it's also extremely pricey and extremely dangerous. A lot of what we need to do in space can be accomplished at the ISS, and a lot of what we need to know about the moon can be accomplished with a probe. We need a more pragmatic purpose to justify the costs.

americaneagle2076 : After 45 years, I STILL, and ALWAYS WILL remember this Great Day!!!!!

carella211 : Im such a nerd, im gonna watch all 3 hours of this and enjoy every minute!

The Presidents of the United States of America : wow how long I was looking for such an official original. Thanks NASA employee!

Sea Wolf : I vote the moon for president!

lotanerve : If this were done today...NIKE would be all over that space suit.

Jon O : Have you ever noticed that most of the people who insist the Moon Landings were "faked" -- also tend to be the same people who insist Bigfoot is real.

spearhead787 : Every time i watch it i go right back to the moment in 1969. A six year old kid sitting up open mouthed with mum and dad, well past his bed time. Watching on our 20 inch black and white TV here in England. It was INCREDIBLE .!!!!

ZCE305 : There are no words to describe the courage of those 3 astronauts

F. Matthew Fagan : Thanks for uploading this. Trolls notwithstanding it's sad to read comments from close-minded ignorant people who still believe this was faked. Even though each and every "fact" supporting a fake has been technically and scientifically refuted in each and every way from such sources as NASA, MIT, Popular Mechanics and even TV's Mythbusters!

killeremo15 : "That's one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind" 3:30

Steve Kilpatrick : The level of ignorance in these comments makes me sad... I'm sure some are trolls, but still...

MrRottenCraft : No "fake" comments please. Get your stuff out of here. We no like you.

kaypiob : Denialists need only a powerful telescope and the ability to look up to learn a thing or two. Some would rather bury their heads in the sand looking for conspiracy than honor mankind's curiosity and advancements. Others would have us back in the stone age.

Paul Martin : It's very difficult to believe Neil is gone now.  What an amazing guy.

NateThatsNasty : this is when we finally learned that the moon is not made of cheese. :')  

Snake's Raven : No matter how many footage, pictures, ... I see of the Moon landings, i still find it amazing and beautiful to watch. Thank you!.

Edivaldo Penteado : Se realmente foram até la, porque nunca mais voltaram???

Javaris Jamar Javarison-Lamar : Directed by Stanley Kubrick

TheRootsMan : OK, guys - I have been wondering for my entire life about that occasional "beeping" sound that you hear coming over the Apollo audio . . . Can anyone enlighten me about that? What was the purpose of this "beep" ? What was it indicative of? Did it come from the earth or the moon? (Insane curiosity going on here . . . )

Jean Philippe : It's amazing how people seem to believe that NASA actually landed man on the moon. All you need to know is simple science and astronomy to realize that they never went there.

EUSSR : So, where are the stars? Or this is a Hollywood studio without stars? )))

:  - To the moon!!! Many citizens of the world have had it in their own minds that NASA placed human beings on the moon between 1969-1972, otherwise known as the Apollo missions. There has also been a challenge to these assertions by those who claim these events were a hoax. If indeed these missions were a hoax, then that would turn the western world scientific community on its ear and prove that the Presidents of the United States and the astronauts are bold faced liars. Many documentaries have been released to bolster confidence in one side or another. It also becomes self evident that if one picture or a single frame of video proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that just one Apollo mission was indeed a hoax, then all of the Apollo missions were indeed a hoax. Many people are very guarded when it comes to the Apollo missions because it is a pivotal event in human societal evolution. The capability for mankind to have evolved to the point where he can touch down on another celestial body within the known universe is an achievement that elevates the spirit of all humanity and suggests that there is nothing that cannot be accomplished in space travel.  - If one were to investigate these claims of a real world hoax, one would understand that there have been photos that have been doctored in the most unscientific manner. One would find NASA documentaries with conflicting information with regards to video footage. One would also find inconsistencies with regards to reflection, light and shadows etc. All of these claims can be reduced to a lack of familiarity with an alien environment, poor attention to detail and "theoretical physics." As we know, theoretical physics can explain anything in the world including the possibility of a squirrel that can journey to the center of the Earth on its own. More to the point is that everything with regards to the legitimacy of the Apollo missions can be explained as "possible" except for one singular photograph.   - This image is from the Apollo 11 mission called #5927. Here is a link to the doctored photograph...  - Here is a link to the original photograph...  - These images happens to be the "Death knell" for the Apollo missions as being a reality. Death knell 1 :  passing bell 2 :  an action or event presaging death or destruction  - merriam webster  - This image #5927 is real world proof that the Apollo missions were a hoax. A staged event. How, you ask? Because the surface of the moon is moving upwards from left to right as a perspective edge would. The edge of the moon cannot be captured as a perspective edge because all perspective edges move towards a horizon line. There is no horizon in this photograph and it is an impossibility for this occurrence to happen on gods green Earth or gods grey moon. There have been many people who challenge this idea by suggesting that the edge is a foreground hill obscuring the horizon, but for this to be true you would have to draw a straight horizontal line from the left of the image where the lunar surface hits the vacuum of space all the way to the right thus passing through the astronaut at the hips and continuing to below where you can see the light change to suggest an up-slope of the hill. In short, this image was taken on a stage and that is the only way how you can explain the surface of the moon as a perspective edge.  - In this photo, #5454, you can see the horizon.  - In this photo, #5480, you can see a horizon.  - Not even theoretical physics can explain the lack of a horizon in this image that I would call the "smoking gun" image for disproving the Apollo missions. You cannot marry these three images together to create a realistic sense of the environment unless you cross your eyes and drop a large brick on your head. You cannot even make a 3d model of this supposed lunar environment and show how the horizon line is missing. The only reason that people would still believe in the Apollo missions happen to be a fear of ridicule and perhaps a sense of a loss of innocence. The greater your income, the more you are expected to believe in the Apollo missions being a reality. For that reason, many will indulge in the practice of willful ignorance.   - I found it strange that in the doctored photograph, the space underneath the Lunar Module overhang on the right and above the strap that hangs around, touching the lunar surface, was not blacked out with the rest of the empty vacuum of space. In looking at the original photograph, the only reason why the vacuum of space was blacked out was to address the light reflection off of a background on the top of the LM and directly to the left of the antennae. It is difficult to see at first, but there is no way you can write it off as a reflection or lens flare because a lens flare or a reflection does not appear in that type of shape. Again, many people can make an argument using the concept of "theoretical physics" and a poor attention to detail but a missing horizon is simply a physical impossibility.  - But why? Why would the U.S. government and the western world media demand the citizens submit to accepting the events of the Apollo missions? Why would they demand that people accept the real world event of a hoax that cannot be a reality? It relates to the concept of submission. It relates to the concept of scientific infallibility at the expense of those who fear mockery and humiliation. The U.S. government claims infallibility when it wants to and the western world scientific community claims infallibility when it wants to. Show this "smoking gun" image to  anyone and ask them to show where the horizon line should be and watch them turn into a complete and total babbling idiot before your very eyes.  - The good news is that the Apollo missions can be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt to be a hoax. The bad news is that the U.S. government is itself a hoax. NASA, along with the IRS, CIA and the FBI are not a part of the U.S. government and never have been. There is no such thing as a Constitutional Republic founded in 1776 when the President of the United States is recognizing a Corporation government founded in 1871. In a real democracy or a real republic, the government is a possession of the citizenry. In a corporation government, the citizenry is the possession of the government. Remember what the 14th ammendment states... 14th ammendment SECTION 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.  - In other words, in order to be or remain a U.S. citizen, you have to agree to the "validity of the public debt of the United States" and that this debt "shall not be questioned?" What if the debt is questionable? What if the government that assumes a debt questionable? What if the politician that accepts a debt questionable? This happens to be law and not legal code or statute which is different than the law. This language is compulsory. Any language in any organisation that is compulsory is tied to the concept of infallibility and slavery. The U.S. government as an institution holds itself as infallible enough to pledge its citizenry as collateral for an unknown future debt. In addition to this, if Americans decided to take back or dissolve the current incarnation of the U.S. government, they will be seen as corporate citizens working to undermine the infallibility of the corporation itself, and therefore will be viewed as an enemy of the state. That is why they phrase the language of this unknown future debt to include "debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion." Now when the protocol of a government becomes more important than the benefit of the citizenry itself, "Does it not mean that the government needs to be dissolved?"  - The reality is that since 1913, the national debt of the United States has been a creation of a "debt system" that is by design impossible to pay back at least 9x over. This "system" is called "Fractional Reserve Banking" and its "money multiplier" function. Essentially for every single legitimate transaction that produces a bank record creates profit for the foreign, private and sovereign Federal Reserve central bank. In short, for every dollar an American has made and spent on the books has created that same dollar at least 9x over for the Federal Reserve. For this reason, not even the President of the United States can by executive order perform a full audit of the Federal Reserve. To break this down, one could argue that before 1871 the U.S. government was a possession of the citizenry in the sense that the citizenry could have had a revolution to restore a system of a government that answers to the citizenry. Since 1871, the citizenry in America has recognized a government that assumes ownership of the corporate citizen as if it was a domestic occupation. Since 1913, this government that acts as an occupier of the American citizen became an institution that submits to a foreign, private and sovereign central bank.  - There is no such thing as a free nation that is sovereign who has a government that answers to a foreign entity like another country or a lending institution. Now how do the Apollo missions play into this deception? Apart from being a distraction from the Viet Nam war, these fraudulent events that involve the lies from the media and from this corrupted government were done as a mass distraction for the Nixon shock of 1971. The Nixon shock was essentially an act by President Nixon that nullified all contracts concerning gold exchange for Federal Reserve Notes. This singular act completely negated the purported interest for creating the Federal Reserve in the first place. The pseudo intellectual rationale was to lessen the volatility of banking confidence even though on paper it was a crime against humanity from its inception. In other words, only a specific few were allowed to become a part of this foreign, private and sovereign central bank so long as they brought their gold.  - So why the hoax? Why the continued insistence on the moon landing being a reality? Why the Nixon shock? Perhaps it was a subtle jab at JFK? For all the positive and negative that JFK brought to the American people, he was not an astro physicist nor did he have enough knowledge about the logistics of a manned mission to the moon. His declaration on September 12th, 1962 about stating "We choose to go to the Moon," was one of uncertainty and ignorance as even NASA's own records showed "off the charts" readings of radiation in the Van Allen Belt. As the president of the United States however, he was the only one with the courage to reestablish the currency production to stem from debt free Silver certificates issued from the U.S. Treasury instead of the Federal Reserve. Although many people will offer up reasons to downplay this act, at the end of the day after June 4, 1963, an American could withdraw their savings in "silver certificates" without having faith in the Federal Reserve and without having faith in the U.S. government, but having complete faith in the protocol of trading paper silver certificates for debt free silver bullion. Of course, JFK was shot to death by magical bullets. It is also no mystery that in the "Report of the Select Committee on Assassinations of the U.S. House of Representatives" MARCH 29, 1979...they mention, and I quote..."Scientific Acoustical Evidence Establishes a High Probability That Two Gunmen Fired at President John F. Kennedy."  - Who knows? Maybe 3 gunmen and a vehicle rigged with hollow point projectiles? Kennedy did mention in his "Economic Report of the President (January 21, 1963)" page XIII..."I again urge a revision in our silver policy to reflect the status of silver as a metal for which there is an expanding industrial demand. Except for its use in coins, silver serves no useful monetary function."...Often times people in "power" will choose to go "off script." That is what lead to the language in Executive Order 11110... "...(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821(b)) [31 U.S.C. 5301 (a), (b)] to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption..."  - In this life, the only currency that a person has are the words that come out of their mouths. The only currency that leaders have, are the actions they take. The same people who will tell you that Roosevelt was correct to incarcerate American citizens for gold hoarding in 1933 are the same ones who will tell you that we went to the moon. Pseudo reality by means of humiliation and mockery. This is all done for the interests of those within Judaism and their practice of usury, otherwise known as privatizing societies via the currency trade. When you exist in a transaction based economy where every dollar made and spent is given at least 9x over to a foreign, private and sovereign central bank, there is no reality except a suggested reality.

b000ring : I've been looking for this kind of footage for a loooong time, thank you

RedhotIta1 : WOW! The best thing that i could wait for! Thanks alot NASA! Thanks for this awesome 45th!

dave Jones : they must have spent billions on getting men on the moon & all that technology  , but they skimped on high grade video cameras..wonder why

westie18 : It all happened. It was and is real. It was so fantastic that people don't think it really happened, but it did. People can believe whatever nonsense they want, they can stay rooted in their supersition and paranoia, but the evidence is still up on the Moon, and still on the Earth with pounds and pounds of Moon rocks and dirt, and astronauts who walked on the Moon and looked back at Earth and remember having done so. Maybe non-believers should stop looking at conspiracy videos and books and talk to the people that took the trip, that made the rockets, that made the crafts, the Lunar Modules were made not more than an hour away from me at Grumman in Bethpage, NY! The people that worked on them know what they did, and where they went! Why do people choose to live in stupidity and believe in nonsense?? It's fact, accept it. We went, we saw, we did it all.

Alan Redmond : I believe we went to the moon. Neil and Buzz are two of the most amazing human beings who have ever lived. Not a single astronaut has ever said we didn't go to the moon. Several astronauts have talked publicly about aliens and advanced technologies that NASA deny, but no astronaut has ever said we didn't walk on the moon. We've not been back since the early 70's so its understandable why people are questioning if we ever went at all. For me the biggest tragedy is the fact mankind has never explored the solar system further than our own doorstep since Neil and Buzz showed mankind what we are capable of.

Jacqueline Mora : Man went to the moon, totally agree, but for example, the ISS is protected by the Electromagnetic field of the earth, do not suffer radiation, how the crew of apollo 11 do it with out this help? Because that can help for Mars mission

Soldier Of Yeshua : no stars ?oO

Chris Kingery : It was a soundstage on Mars.

Егор Декстер : I"m  delighted that We're on the moon ! Yay !

JoJo McJoJo : Life on Earth is a hoax.  Apollo was one of the few truly real things ever to happen.

FlexZ : "One giant leap for mankind" and poses the US flag.

Timestoppa : Why is it that EVERYWHERE I go on YouTube that is the least bit moon-related, there are hundreds of comments saying "fake!!!"?

westie18 : What I find amusing is how truly silly is the list of "evidence of fakery" that these Moon landing conspiracy nuts usually provide. All of what they say is easily debunked as paranoid assumptions based on lack of scientific and photographic knowledge. 

Bilegjargal : The sunlight can't reach the Moon unless it has air. Air makes the sunlight on the earth.  Neil's clothes were brightened. Still thinking about that...

EmmaInCandyland : Why do they look to be translucent?

Hamza : 3:30 to 3:37 "One small step for giant leap for mankind" :D

jpamusher : Forget Skylab,the Shuttle,and ISS,we should have continued Apollo and Apollo Applications! We likely would have had a small lunar base by the late 70`s!

SpeedBird The Hog Driver : Still for ever the biggest humanity archievement ever!

John Rios : No puedo creeer que los gringos sean tan imbeciles para tragarse esta mamada

NATO TERRORISTA OTAN STRIPADOR MAL DO MUNDO : Quanta mentira desses falsários, EUA é bom em falsificação,  ele falsifica tudo ate seu dinheiro e falso não é a toa que os chineses aprenderam com eles. Porque a NASA não divulga de que forma eles voltaram para terra já que na TV e jornais publicavam eles só tem combustíveis de ida kkk falsificação e tudo que os norte americanos sabem fazer agora venham aqui seu fdpt e me criticam por eu fala a verdade.

Bob B. : I would think they would have better cameras 30 yrs after,say,The Wizard of Oz?

Lucca Isse : Thanks NASA for sharing this moment with us, the humanity!!!

SCARSAC : wow so awesome thanks nasa for the eva in its entirety

netsite69 : How can an astronaut lived on the moon while the temperature extremest hot (250F to 300F)? That is impossible!

Snoxicle : Why does everybody think this is fake?

Svonkie : They said they put a man on the moon, but NASA so bungled the video of the landing that they claim they indadvertedly "erased and reused" the original footage of what is considered to be the most monumental feat in human history.  And people why trust in government is at an all-time low. 

altfactor : I don't think the images were this good on the original broadcast.